1.         Palmer, J. & Moore, C. M. (in press).  Using a filtering task to measure the spatial extent of attention. Vision Research. pdf

2.         Enns, J. T., Lleras, A., & Moore, C. M. (in press).  The contribution of object updating to perceptual continuity and scene stability in human vision.  To appear in Issues of space in time in perception and action.  R. Nihjawan (Ed.): Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK. pdf

3.         Moore, C. M. (in press).  Inattentional Blindness. To appear in Oxford Companion to Consciousness.  A. Cleermans, T. Bayne, & P. Wilken (Eds.): Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pdf

4.         Moore, C. M. & Lanagan-Leitzel, L. K. & Fine, E. M. (in press). Distinguishing between the precision of attentional localization and attentional resolution. Perception & Psychophysics. pdfs/moore_et_al_2008_PP. pdf

5.         Chen, P., Moore, C. M., Mordkoff, J. T. (in press).  On the Spatial Metric of Short-SOA Costs of Exogenous Cuing. American Journal of Psychology.

6.         Moore, C. M., Mordkoff, J. T, & Enns, J. T. (2007).  The path of least persistence: Evidence of object-mediated visual updating. Vision Research, 47, 1624-1630. pdf

7.         Moore, C. M., Lanagan-Leitzel, L. K., Chen, P. Halterman, R., & Fine, E. F. (2007).  Nonspatial attributes of stimuli can influence spatial limitations of attentional control.  Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 363-37. pdf

8.         Lleras, A., & Moore, C. M. (2006).  What you see is what you get: Functional equivalence of a perceptually filled-in surface and a physically presented stimulus.  Psychological Science, 17, 876-881. pdf

9.         Moore, C. M., & Lanagan-Letizel, L. K. (2006).  Research refutes ‘Misconceptions’.  Aquatics International. 18, 10-11.

10.      Moore, C. M., & Fulton, C. (2005).  The spread of attention to hidden portions of occluded surfaces.  Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 301-306. pdf

11.      Moore, C. M., & Lleras, A. (2005). On the role of object representations in substitution masking.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1171-1180. pdf

12.      Moore, C. M. (2004). Objects, objects everywhere, so what are we to think? Objects and attention by Brian J. Scholl (Ed.).  Contemporary Psychology.

13.      Lleras, A., Moore, C. M., & Mordkoff, J. T. (2004).  Looking for the source of the Simon effect:  Evidence for multiple codes. American Journal of Psychology, 117, 531-542.

14.      Moore, C. M. & Enns, J. T. (2004).  Substitution masking and the flash-lag effect.  Psychological Science, 15, 866-871. pdf

15.      Moore, C. M., Lleras, A., Grosjean, M., & Marrara, M. T. (2004). Using inattentional blindness as an operational definition of unattended: A response-end effect.  Visual Cognition, 11, 705-719. pdf

16.      Griffiths, T., & Moore, C.M. (2004). A matter of perception: Why lifegurads sometimes fail to see victims on the bottom of the pool.  Aquatics International, 16, 14-15. pdf

17.      Osman, A., Moore, C. M., Ulrich, R. (2003).  Temporal organization of covert motor processes during response selection and preparation.  Biological Psychology, 64, 47-75. pdf

18.      Marrara, M. T., & Moore, C. M. (2003).  The role of the directional cue in the two-rectangles method of assessing object-based selection.  Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1103-1109. pdf

19.      Lleras, A., & Moore, C. M. (2003). When the target becomes a mask: Using apparent motion to isolate the object component of object-substitution masking.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 106-120. pdf

20.      Moore, C. M., Grosjean, M., & Lleras, A. (2003).  Using inattentional blindness as an operational definition of unattended:  The case of perceptual completion.  Visual Cognition, 10, 299-318. pdf

21.      Brown, L. E., Moore, C. M., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2002). Differential Processing of color and depth for recognition and action.  Journal of Experimental Psychology:  Human Perception and Performance, 29, 106-120. pdf

22.      Moore, C. M., Elsinger, C. E., & Lleras, A. (2001).  Spatial attention and the apprehension of spatial relations: The case of depth.  Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 595-606. pdf

23.      Moore, C. M. (2001).  Inattentional Blindness: Perception or memory and what does it matter? Psyche: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Consciousness, 7. pdf

24.      Moore, C. M., & Brown, L. E. (2001).  Preconstancy information can influence visual search:  The case of lightness constancy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 27, 178-194. pdf

25.      Moore, C. M. (2001). Extensive and fresh coverage, but lacks theoretical focus:  Visual Attention by Richard D. Wright (Ed.).  Contemporary Psychology, 46, 147-149. pdf

26.      Moore, C. M., & Wolfe, J. M. (2001).  Getting beyond the serial/parallel debate in visual search: A hybrid approach. In K. Shapiro (Ed.) The limits of attention: Temporal constraints on human information processing. (pp. 178-198) Oxford: Oxford University Press. pdf

27.      Marrara, M. T., & Moore, C. M. (2000). Role of perceptual organization while attending in depth. Perception & Psychophysics. 62, 786-799. pdf

28.      Moore, C. M. (1999).  Cognitive impenetrability of early vision does not imply cognitive impenetrability of perception.  Behavioral and Brain Sciences.  2, 385-386. pdf

29.      Moore, C. M. & Egeth, H. (1998).  How does feature-based attention affect visual processing?  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1296-1310. pdf

30.      Moore, C. M., Yantis, S., & Vaughan, B. (1998).  Object-based visual selection:  Evidence from perceptual completion.  Psychological Science, 9, 104-110. pdf

31.      Moore, C. M., & Egeth, H. (1997).  Perception without attention:  Evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention.  Journal of Experimental Psychology:  Human Perception and Performance, 23, 339-352. pdf

32.      Moore, C. M., Egeth, H., Berglan, L., & Luck, S. J. (1996).  Are attentional dwell times inconsistent with serial visual search?  Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 360-365. pdf

33.      Moore, C. M. (1996).  Does negative priming imply preselective identification of irrelevant stimuli?  Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 91-94. pdf

34.      Osman, A., Moore, C. M., & Ulrich, R. (1996).  Bisecting RT with lateralized readiness potentials:  Precue effects after LRP onset.  Acta Psychologica, 90, 111-127. pdf

35.      Vaughan, J., Rosenbaum, D. A., Diedrich, F. J., & Moore, C. M. (1996).  Cooperative selection of movements:  The optimal selection model.  Psychological Research, 58, 254-273. pdf

36.      Moore, C. M. (1994).  Negative priming depends on probe-trial conflict:  Where has all the inhibition gone?  Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 133-147. pdf

37.      Ulrich, R., Moore, C. M., & Osman, A. M. (1994).  Lateralized readiness potential and reaction time:  The effect of partial response cues.  The German Journal of Psychology, 18, 36-37.

38.      Moore, C. M., & Osman, A. M. (1993).  Looking for two targets at the same time:  One search or two?  Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 381-390.

39.      Osman, A. M., & Moore, C. M. (1993).  The locus of dual-task interference:  Psychological refractory effects on movement-related brain potentials.  Journal of Experimental Psychology:  Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1292-1312. pdf

40.      Ulrich, R., Moore, C. M., & Osman, A. M. (1993).  Lateralisiertes Bereitschaftspotential und Reaktionsgeschwindigkeit bei partieller Vorinformation eines Handlungsparameters.  Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 40, 310-325.

41.      Andrzejewski, S. J., Moore, C. M., Corvette, M., & Herrmann, D. (1991).  Prospective memory skill.  Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 304-306.

42.      Petro, S. J.,  Herrmann, D., Burrows, D., & Moore, C. M. (1991).  Usefulness of commercial memory aids as a function of age.  International Journal of aging and human development, 33, 295-309.